Nikala Scholtz vs Luis David Martinez Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W L W W L
Form
L L W L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Scholtz 1 - 0 Martinez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Scholtz winning 2 and Martinez winning 0. The last match between Scholtz and Martinez was at the Mexico F3 (Cordoba), 10-05-2017, Second, Hard with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nikala Scholtz | 1 |
| Luis David Martinez | 0 |
Mexico F3 (Cordoba)(10-05-2017)
6
2
6
3
| Scholtz | Stats | Martinez |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 320 | Highest Rank | 390 |
| 34 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 65% (217-119) | Career Total W/L | 49% (267-278) |
| $4,340 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Luis David Martinez
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 58% (28/48) | 1st Serve % | 61% (34/56) |
| 86% (24/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (22/34) |
| 70% (14/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 46% (26/56) | Return Points Win % | 21% (10/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nikala Scholtz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maciej Smola
Player
Nikala Scholtz
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Patrick Foley
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Joshua Luck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
54 of
66)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jean Thirouin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Nikala Scholtz
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Allen Johnson
Player
Nikala Scholtz
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Dusty H. Boyer
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Luis David Martinez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Zeballos
Player
Luis David Martinez
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Luis David Martinez
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Luis David Martinez
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristian Rodriguez
Player
Luis David Martinez
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rafael Matos
Player
Luis David Martinez
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Luis David Martinez
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(3) 7-5 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (217/119) | Win/Loss | 49% (267/278) |
| 60% (466/307) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (602/635) |
| 54% (4049/3491) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (5644/5800) |
| 67% (213/104) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (196/175) |
| 17% (1/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (64/97) |
| 23% (3/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1598 | Aces Total | 463 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 512 | Total Double Faults | 549 |
| 1:1:36 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 602.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 529.6 |
| 65% (8867/13657) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5223/8914) |
| 75% (6628/8867) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3502/5223) |
| 51% (2445/4791) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1722/3691) |
| 39% (501/1279) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (363/859) |
| 37% (5397/14428) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3516/8922) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (5/8) | Cups W/L | 44% (8/10) |
| 44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (5/20) | Challenger W/L | 43% (52/70) |
| 70% (203/86) | Futures W/L | 51% (207/198) |
| 65% (209/324) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (254/525) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 64% (7/11) |
| 55% (77/139) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (69/127) |
| 64% (64/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (72/141) |
| 92% (191/176) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (268/226) |
| 8% (191/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (268/41) |
| 26% (144/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (276/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
